The statement nobody got: Mark Fast and healthy curves

Curve skeptics!

In all the debate over Mark Fast’s runway show, nobody seems to be asking the obvious question: Why do we see healthy women’s bodies as flawed?

In case you haven’t heard: Fast did the unthinkable at this year’s London Fashion Week: He sent plus-size models down the runway in skin-tight material. Bye-bye, baby doll tops, and let the controversy begin: The outfits were “unflattering”—a “detriment” to plus-size models, critics said.

Yet bone-hugging fabric on underweight women? We heard not a peep about how unflattering that is. Those women are not flawed, you see. And that, my friends, is where the problem lies.

We hide “muffin tops” with fervor and learn young how to minimize our “worst” assets. So when Fast revealed the secrets under the camouflage, the “oh my!” gasp traveled worldwide.

The plus-size women looked healthy. By contrast, some of the regular models looked very underweight. So tell me, why are these outfits flattering …

… and these aren’t?

Bravo, Mark Fast, for keeping the conversation going.

I’m a freelance writer and editor. Read more about my fascinating self here.

Advertisements
Published in: on 03/08/2010 at 12:00 am  Comments (1)  
Tags: , , , ,

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://hollywoodweightwatch.wordpress.com/2010/03/08/the-statement-nobody-got-mark-fasts-2010-london-fashion-week-show/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

One CommentLeave a comment

  1. […] So, note to casting directors: Next romantic comedy, bring in some normal-weight women. Just look how much publicity Mark Fast got! […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: